Frequently used policies include issuing health advice, social distancing at the work place, case isolation, household quarantines, community contact reduction, shop and school closures, prohibitions of mass gatherings and travel restrictions ( OECD, 2020a). Such responses need to strike a fine balance, allowing economic activity to take place, while instilling the sense of safety and confidence that people need to get back to business.Īs the COVID-19 pandemic took hold of the world, countries responded with unprecedented restrictions on movement and professional and social interactions. ![]() These experiences suggest more targeted restrictions and heavy investments in the capacity to test for the virus, track contacts and isolate cases may help limit confinement and the spread of the virus. Countries using all these approaches have managed to bring the virus under control, but at widely different cost to society. Others relied heavily on testing, tracking and isolation of the sick. Some countries locked down their economies with few exceptions, while some allowed most economic activity to go ahead subject to observing physical distancing and hygiene advice. ![]() By Jon Pareliussen and Daniela Glocker, OECD Economics DepartmentĬlosing down social and professional interactions have helped bringing COVID-19 outbreaks under control, but at high economic and human cost.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |